IMS Menopause Live

Dear friends, colleagues, contributors, reviewers and readers

With the advent of a new IMS Board under the leadership of Professor Susan Davis, I thought it timely to bring you all up to date with the progress of our journal.

At the recent 16th IMS World Congress on the Menopause in Vancouver, Canada, our Editorial Board, Editors and publisher met to discuss progress and future plans. We will continue to publish six issues per year and, within those issues, we will from time to time have special themed issues with high-level reviews on topics of importance to us all. The first of these was on screening for women at midlife and was published in June. Our August issue will focus on Progesterone in its many guises. More special issues are planned as well, including one focusing on papers presented at the recent World Congress. We will continue to publish occasional issues of Climacteric in Chinese, including, from 2019, abstracts in Chinese available on line. I am hopeful that we may be able to establish a Spanish-language equivalent in the near future.

I am pleased to advise that Taylor & Francis will remain the publisher of Climacteric under a new 5-year contract signed in Vancouver.

I am also delighted to inform you that the most recent Impact Factor for Climacteric is 2.807, an increase of over 23% and the highest in the journal’s history. This is a testimony to our authors and to the standard of scientific papers published in our journal.

The Impact Factor is also a testimony to the hard work of our peer reviewers, our management team and our Editors, most particularly Nick Panay and Anna Fenton who were Joint Editors-in-Chief of Climacteric until September 2016. I wish to thank them and to congratulate all involved.

11 June 2018

When any food is served, we examine it by its esthetics, color, smell and taste, and the end evaluation is summarized by a simple question that echoes in our mind: did we like it? So food is not just nourishment. It may have psychic effects of all sorts. We enjoy food, we speak about food, eating together may be a social event.

The relationships between dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, and other carbohydrate measures (added sugars, total sugars, glucose, sucrose, lactose, fructose, starch, carbohydrate) and depression in the women who participated in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study at baseline (n = 87,618) and at the 3-year follow-up (n = 69,954) were investigated [1]. The results suggested that high glycemic index diets could be a risk factor for depression in postmenopausal women. What we eat is usually categorized as healthy or unhealthy, depending on its contents. Studies are still being published to demonstrate the advantage of raw, plant-based foods over processed foods. As an example, a recent study in young adults showed that raw fruit and vegetable intake predicted reduced depressive symptoms and higher positive mood, life satisfaction, and flourishing [2]. A cross-sectional study in China among 906 postmenopausal participants identified three dietary patterns: processed foods (refined grains, preserved foods, fat meat, fried foods, and sweets), whole plant foods (whole grains, vegetables, and fruits), and animal foods (fish, lean meat, and milk products) [3]. The conclusion was that dietary patterns featuring a low intake of processed foods and/or a high intake of whole plant foods were associated with a reduced risk of depression and perceived stress. Contrarily, the highest tertile score for processed foods was associated with a 79% increased risk of depression. It appears that various electrolytes and minerals may also play an important role in regard to mood and cognition. Adequate physiologic status of iron and zinc may enhance cognitive and emotional functioning [4]. Several studies found improvements in aspects of mood and cognition after iron supplementation, regardless of whether the participant was initially iron-insufficient or iron-deficient.

21 May, 2018

A famous saying goes: It is better to be rich and healthy than poor and sick. A side-saying broadens this simple fact by clarifying that you would better be rich if you are sick. There have been numerous studies on the association of socioeconomic status with health and disease, and there is no need to enlarge on that. However, a new study from the United States, where money really talks, has found alarming data that must be discussed by the citizens and their administration [1]. The study analyzed data on a cohort of 51–61-year-old people at baseline, who were followed long-term. The participants of the Health and Retirement Study gave detailed information on their wealth (housing, businesses, individual retirement accounts, cash and savings accounts, investment holdings, loans, debts, etc.), and accordingly were grouped into wealthy or poor. Furthermore, they were divided into subgroups that considered changes in wealth during the study period, i.e. those who maintained or increased their wealth, those who lost wealth, and those who experienced ‘wealth shock’, defined as loss of at least 75% of their wealth during a period of 2 years. All-cause mortality data were obtained as well, which allowed examination of associations between mortality risk and economic status. The sample size was 8714 participants with a mean follow-up of 17.7 years, totaling 80,683 person-years; 26.2% experienced a negative wealth shock and 6.9% had long-term asset poverty. A total of 2823 participants died during follow-up. In the positive-wealth-without-shock reference group, the crude mortality rate was 30.6 deaths per 1000 person-years. By contrast, the crude mortality rates were 64.9 per 1000 person-years for those who experienced a negative wealth shock and 73.4 per 1000 person-years for those who had asset poverty.

 16 April, 2018

Recently, contradictory reports were published concerning the association between the serum concentration of irisin and the physical activity level and fitness status in healthy humans. Irisin is a newly identified myokine that induces the ‘browning’ of white adipose tissue (WAT). Buscemi and colleagues studied a cohort of 858 healthy individuals in Palermo, Sicily, as a part of the ABCD (Alimentazione, Benessere Cardiovascolare e Diabete) study, and found a significant positive correlation between serum irisin concentration and habitual physical activity [1]. However, Binianinov and colleagues showed that serum irisin concentration was not related to any measures of short-term physical activity, habitual physical activity, or physical fitness in a cross-sectional analysis of 300 healthy humans who had participated in the Karlsruhe Metabolomics and Nutrition (KarMeN) study in Germany [2].

Comment

Regular physical activity and fitness are closely related to a positive healthy status in humans [2]. In this context, the muscle becomes more important due to its function as an endocrine organ. Muscle tissue secretes ‘myokines’ in response to physical activity and it is speculated that these myokines are involved in physical activity-induced positive health effects.

20 March, 2018

Member of the IMS Board

The IMS Board works tirelessly to support the aims of the Society and to ensure that the best educational resources and updates on research are available to all the membership. However, do you really know who they are? This new occasional profile series gives you the opportunity to learn more about each Board member, providing a personal perspective and insight into the people who represent the leadership of the Society.

Professor Steven Goldstein

Is Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at New York University School of Medicine and Treasurer of the International Menopause Society.

I’ve been reading

Cells are The New Cure by Robin L. Smith, MD and Max Gomez, PhD. This is a cutting-edge look for an intelligent lay-audience by two scientists about the current and future use of stem cells.

I’ve been researching

Making the diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding/postmenopausal bleeding truly ‘point of care’. In some cases, this means sonohysterography and, in other cases, these new disposable office hysteroscopes.

My team

Since I am not subspecialty trained, I do not have a ‘division’ but am able to call on very astute colleagues from all major areas of Ob/Gyn in my institution at New York University School of Medicine.

An anecdote

I recently had a total knee replacement. I was signed up to be done by the head orthopedist at the number one-rated orthopedic hospital not only in New York, but in the United States. I subsequently had another opinion with a doctor at my own institution. He performed not only an X-ray of the knee but a scan of my lower extremities. It was clearly obvious (even to my untrained eye) that the polyethylene in my 15-year-old right hip replacement had almost worn through. He informed me that, if this were allowed to totally wear through so that the titanium implants rubbed on each other causing them to loosen, that this would be a major problem. Needless to say, I switched physicians and had my knee fixed and am in the process of planning a revision on my hip as well. The lesson is, we must see the whole patient and not just use such tunnel vision as the first surgeon exercised.

An interesting case

I was once asked to perform a transvaginal ultrasound on a sterile gorilla at The Bronx Zoo when they were moving the animals to a different portion of the facility. Once anesthetized, the animals were brought into the zoo’s hospital where various medical specialists evaluated the gorillas. This one female gorilla had never become pregnant. Dressed in hospital gown and glove, I began to perform a transvaginal ultrasound. The adult female gorilla has a short stubby vagina and axial uterus. This made visualization of the pelvis virtually impossible. They say that necessity is the mother of invention. I put the probe into the rectum, turned it 90 degrees and got beautiful images of the endometrial echo which was thin and there were ‘streaked’ ovaries. If there ever were such a thing as a Turner’s Syndrome in a gorilla, this was it. With the head veterinarian, we wrote a paper that transvaginal ultrasound was of limited value in the species gorilla gorilla gorilla. Since that time, in young virgins and older patients with a stenotic vagina, I have routinely performed transrectal ultrasound with great success.

19 February, 2018

Member of the IMS Board

The IMS Board works tirelessly to support the aims of the Society and to ensure that the best educational resources and updates on research are available to all the membership. However, do you really know who they are? This new occasional profile series gives you the opportunity to learn more about each Board member, providing a personal perspective and insight into the people who represent the leadership of the Society.

Professor Sunila Khandelwal

Is the Director of Midlife Women Health Care & Menopause Centre, working as Senior Consultant in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Fortis Escorts Hospital, Jaipur, India. She is a member of the Board of Trustees of the International Menopause Society.

I’ve been reading

Literature on 'Art of Living', the spiritual and scientific benefit of yoga. I love reading the books of famous authors like Dale Carnegie, Shobha De and Robin Sharma to satisfy my interest, other than updating myself through scientific academic journals.

I’ve been researching

On psychosomatic health and lifestyle recommendations to reduce non-communicable diseases to improve the quality of life specifically in the Indian scenario. My recent interest is to have a new insight into female sexuality, management of menopause with endometriosis – a challenging situation but poorly researched. Further studies are required in the area of reproductive factors affecting the longevity and how to empower women with early age of menopause in my own country.

My team

I am privileged to be a leader in my journey with a strong dedicated team, especially the members of the young enthusiastic group who have the same passion as me to work for the health care of mature women, both in the government and private sectors and also the non-profit organizations who contribute to the social cause at all levels.

An anecdote

The documentary film that I prepared during my Presidential year in the Indian Menopause Society gave me a great sense of satisfaction as it is acted as a wonderful vehicle for changing the lives of women. The up-to-date and accessible medical information together with other lifestyle measures provided a unique, commonsense guide for this ‘rite of passage’. Also I am thankful to the International Menopause Society for providing the annual theme-based public education leaflets for World Menopause Month, which I have enjoyed translating into Hindi; globally non-resident Indians are benefitting through the IMS website!

11 December, 2017: 

Many studies link weight/body mass index (BMI) to breast cancer risk. However, BMI affects risk differently before and after menopause. Before menopause, being overweight or obese modestly decreases breast cancer risk whereas, after menopause, being overweight or obese increases breast cancer risk. Several recent studies have shed light on other relevant perspectives of this link. The Women's Health Initiative trial provided data on the potential association between the metabolic syndrome and breast cancer risk [1]. The evaluated parameters were: blood glucose, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, waist circumference, and BMI. Women were then classified into six metabolic obesity phenotypes according to their BMI: 18.5 – < 25, 25 – < 30, > 30 kg/m²) and presence of the metabolic syndrome (> three of the following: waist circumference > 88 cm, triglycerides > 150 mg/dl, HDL cholesterol < 50 mg/dl, glucose > 100 mg/dl, and systolic/diastolic blood pressure > 130/85 mmHg or treatment for hypertension). The cohort included about 21,000 postmenopausal women and over 15 years of follow-up; 1176 cases of invasive breast cancer were diagnosed. Obesity, regardless of metabolic health, was associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Being obese and metabolically unhealthy were associated with the highest risk: HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.33–1.96. These associations were stronger in women who had never used hormone therapy. The investigators concluded that, beyond BMI, metabolic health should be considered a clinically relevant and modifiable risk factor for breast cancer.

What about weight changes? Does weight gain increase the risk? Contrarily, will weight loss help to lower the risk of breast cancer? The Nurses' Health Study demonstrated, in a huge cohort, that weight gain after the age of 18 years was unrelated to breast cancer incidence before menopause, but was positively associated with incidence after menopause [2]. This increased risk with weight gain was limited to women who never used postmenopausal hormones; among these women, the relative risk (RR) was 1.99 (95% CI 1.43–2.76) for weight gain of more than 20 kg vs. unchanged weight (p for trend < 0.001). Furthermore, the percentage of postmenopausal breast cancer accounted for by weight gain alone was approximately 16%. The Nurses' Health Study also presented data on the opposite case scenario, namely on weight loss and breast cancer risk [3]. Women who had never used postmenopausal hormones, lost 10.0 kg or more since menopause, and kept the weight off were at a lower risk than those who maintained weight (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21–0.86; p = 0.01 for weight loss trend).

13 November, 2017

Dementia will become more common as our population ages. Globally, 15 million people were affected by dementia in 2015 and this number is expected to triple by 2050. Reduced exposure to dementia risk factors and increased exposure to protective factors create a 'cognitive buffer', reducing the progression to, or delaying the onset of, dementia.

It is thought that more than one-third of dementia cases may be preventable by modifying nine lifestyle factors. It has recently been suggested by the Lancet Commission on Dementia Prevention, Intervention and Care that, even if there is a genetic tendency for dementia, addressing these nine factors across the lifespan is associated with a reduced risk of dementia in later life [1]. There is no disease-modifying treatment for any common dementia, so delaying the onset of dementia would be of great benefit to the individual, their families and supporters, as well as the general community.

The potentially modifiable risk factors are:

• not completing secondary education in early life (under 18 years old),
• high blood pressure, obesity and hearing loss in midlife (age 45-65 years),
• smoking, depression, physical inactivity, social isolation, and diabetes in later life (greater than 65 years).

23 October 2017: 

Energy-dense foods are foods with a high proportion of energy relative to the food weight. Such foods are considered obesogenic. Hence, consumption of energy-dense foods, particularly those with a high content of unsaturated fats and sugar, predicts weight gain and greater waist circumference. This in turn increases the risk of obesity-related cancers such as breast, bowel, ovarian, endometrial, kidney, gallbladder, esophageal and pancreatic cancer.

Foods with a high dietary energy density (DED; kilocalories or kilojoules/gram of food or beverages consumed) may be associated with lower overall satiety (feeling of fullness), resulting in greater overall energy intake, whereas low energy-dense diets have been reported as resulting in weight loss and less hunger compared with dietary fat restriction in a year-long trial [1].

The association between energy-dense foods and the incidence of obesity-associated cancers has been further explored in an analysis of data from 92,295 postmenopausal women, aged between 50 and 79 years, who were enrolled in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study in the US [2]. DED was defined as the amount of energy (calories or kilojoules) per gram of food. Each woman’s DED was assessed by self-reporting, using a food frequency questionnaire at baseline. The incidence of obesity-related cancer was self-reported at baseline and follow-up, and re-confirmed during the 14.6 ± 5.6 years of follow-up using medical records.

16 October 2017: 

The prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is constantly increasing to very alarming figures, and this already has a huge impact on society in terms of needed medical and nursing services as well as the associated financial burden. Herein, I bring a very condensed bullet-type summary published in Medscape by the author of a paper, just published in the Journal of the American Geriatric Society [1]. First, the major risk factors, which are not modifiable, are age and female gender, and the presence of the apolipoprotein E ε4 allele. Still many risk factors may be modified and thus should be considered as worthy targets in the prevention of AD. These include optimal management of diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance, obesity, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, cerebrovascular disease, depression, psychological and physiologic stress, traumatic brain injury, sleep-disordered breathing, smoking, alcohol abuse, high blood pressure, renal disease, alcohol and tobacco use, high cholesterol, coronary heart disease, sedentary lifestyle, and diet. These potentially modifiable risk factors, when combined, account for more than 50% of AD risk, based on observational studies. To note, many of these risk factors do not appear to affect amyloid or tau proteins.